Search for: All records

Abstract Understanding how mixed-species forests uptake subsurface water sources is critical to projecting future forest water use and stress. Variation in root water uptake (RWU) depths and volumes is common among trees but it is unclear how it is affected by species identity, local water availability or neighboring tree species compositions. We evaluated the hypothesis that RWU depths and the age of water (i.e., time since water entered soils as precipitation) taken up by red maples (Acer rubrum) varied significantly between two forested plots, both containing red maples, similar soils, topography and hydrologic conditions, but having different neighboring tree species. We measured soil moisture contents as well as stable isotopes (δ2H, δ18O) in plant xylem water and soil moisture across two years. These data were used to calibrate process-based stand-level ecohydrological models for each plot to estimate species-level RWU depths. Model calibration suggested significant differences in red maple tree RWU depths, transpiration rates and the ages of water taken up by maples across the two stands. Maple trees growing with ash and white spruce relied on significantly deeper and older water from the soil profile than maple trees growing with birch and oak. The drought risk profile experienced by maple trees differed between the plots as demonstrated by strong correlations between precipitation and model simulated transpiration on a weekly time scale for maples taking up shallow soil moisture and a monthly time scale for maples reliant on deeper soil moisture. These findings carry significant implications for our understanding of water competition in mixed-species forests and for the representation of forest rooting strategies in hydrologic and earth systems models. 

Abstract Increases in hydrological extremes, including drought, are expected for Amazon forests. A fundamental challenge for predicting forest responses lies in identifying ecological strategies which underlie such responses. Characterization of species-specific hydraulic strategies for regulating water-use, thought to be arrayed along an ‘isohydric–anisohydric’ spectrum, is a widely used approach. However, recent studies have questioned the usefulness of this classification scheme, because its metrics are strongly influenced by environments, and hence can lead to divergent classifications even within the same species. Here, we propose an alternative approach positing that individual hydraulic regulation strategies emerge from the interaction of environments with traits. Specifically, we hypothesize that the vertical forest profile represents a key gradient in drought-related environments (atmospheric vapor pressure deficit, soil water availability) that drives divergent tree water-use strategies for coordinated regulation of stomatal conductance (gs) and leaf water potentials (ΨL) with tree rooting depth, a proxy for water availability. Testing this hypothesis in a seasonal eastern Amazon forest in Brazil, we found that hydraulic strategies indeed depend on height-associated environments. Upper canopy trees, experiencing high vapor pressure deficit (VPD), but stable soil water access through deep rooting, exhibited isohydric strategies, defined by little seasonal change in the diurnal pattern of gs and steady seasonal minimum ΨL. In contrast, understory trees, exposed to less variable VPD but highly variable soil water availability, exhibited anisohydric strategies, with fluctuations in diurnal gs that increased in the dry season along with increasing variation in ΨL. Our finding that canopy height structures the coordination between drought-related environmental stressors and hydraulic traits provides a basis for preserving the applicability of the isohydric-to-anisohydric spectrum, which we show here may consistently emerge from environmental context. Our work highlights the importance of understanding how environmental heterogeneity structures forest responses to climate change, providing a mechanistic basis for improving models of tropical ecosystems.